Dow Chemical Co. v. Mahlum
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1475OPINION
By the Court,
Rose, J.:
This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment against the Dow Chemical Company (“Dow Chemical”) for fraud and negligence in connection with alleged defects in silicone gel breast implants manufactured by Dow Corning Corporation (“Dow Corning”).1
The issues before this court are whether substantial evidence in the record supports the jury verdict and whether a new trial was warranted based on numerous alleged trial errors. We conclude that the verdict in this case cannot stand as to the fraud and accessory liability claims. We also conclude, however, that the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Juhl v. AiringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Rivera v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Nelson v. HeerNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Ges, Inc. v. CorbittNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Daniel I. Colton, United States of America v. Daniel I. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.