Ramish v. Kirschbraun & Sons
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. The action was brought by A. Ramish against Kirschbraun & Son% to recover the amount of six hundred dollars damages, alleged to have been sustained by the negligence of the defendants to deliver a carload of eggs according to agreement upon their arrival at Los Angeles. The verdict rendered was for the sum of four hundred and eighty dollars.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. The action was brought by A. Ramish against Kirschbraun & Son% to recover the amount of six hundred dollars damages, alleged to have been sustained by the negligence of the defendants to deliver a carload of eggs according to agreement upon their arrival at Los Angeles. The verdict rendered was for the sum of four hundred and eighty dollars. Further facts are stated in the opinions of the court rendered upon former appeals in 90 Cal. 581, 98 Cal. 576, and in the opinion of the court…
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeals from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial. The facts of the case will he found stated in the opinions of this court ren*661dered upon former appeals. (Ramish v. Kirschbraun, 90 Cal. 581; 98 Cal. 676.)
The evidence warranted the jury in believing, as from the verdict it will be presumed it did believe, that the carload of eggs was sold by defendants to plaintiff, to be delivered to the latter in Los Angeles in due course of freight transportation from either Omaha, Nebraska, or some point of shipment in Iowa. By agreement, also, the bill of lading made to defendants as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Erwin v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Newcomb v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Ramish v. Kirschbraun & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ramish v. Kirschbraun & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Portland Flouring Mills Co. v. British & Foreign Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Masoner v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Brinkley-Douglas Fruit Co. v. SilmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Andrews v. SchreiberU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1899
- Henderson v. E. Lauer & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919