Legal Opinion

Ramish v. Kirschbraun & Sons

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1893No. 19165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denyiug a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and more fully in the opinion upon the former appeal reported in 90 Cal. 581.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion of the court found in 90 Cal. 581, where the judgment and order of the trial court were reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. A new trial was had, judgment again went for plaintiff, and the case is now before us for the second time. Plaintiff in Los Angeles purchased from defendants in Omaha, a carload of eggs to be delivered in Los Angeles. *677The eggs arrived in Los Angeles July 8th, but owing, as it is claimed, to the negligence of the defendants, plaintiff was unable to secure possession of them until July 14th. In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ramish v. Kirschbraun & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramish v. Kirschbraun & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Deal v. Wapsie Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API