Legal Opinion
Henderson v. E. Lauer & Sons
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 1919No. Civ. No. 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
It is alleged in the complaint that defendant “became indebted to R. F. Smith & Sons Company, Chicago, Illinois, in the sum of $471.31, lawful money of the United States, upon an express contract, fot goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered to said defendant” at its special instance and request; that before filing the complaint, Smith & Sons Company assigned the said claim to plaintiff and that no part thereof has been paid.
The answer denies the averments of the complaint except that defendant herein admits that it is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $31.91. The cause was tried by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Greenwood Grocery Co. v. Canadian County Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Hilmer v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Sanborn v. ShipherdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Ramish v. Kirschbraun & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Puritas Coffee & Tea Co. v. De MartiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- In Re Hedgeside Distillery Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1952
- Francis H. Leggett & Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965