Legal Opinion

Ramish v. Kirschbraun & Sons

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1891No. 13818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

— It is alleged in the complaint that on or about June 25, 1888, the defendants agreed to deliver to plaintiff, at Los Angeles, 12,000 dozen of eggs for the sum of $1,770, as soon as the same could be transported by rail from Omaha, Nebraska; that the eggs arrived at Los Angeles on July 8, 1888, but defendants did not deliver them to plaintiff until July 14th, although he was ready and willing at all times on and after the 8th to receive and pay for them; that by reason of the failure of defendants to deliver the eggs to plaintiff upon their arrival at Los Angeles, he sustained damages to the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Keating v. Basich Bros. Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Ramish v. Kirschbraun & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ramish v. Kirschbraun & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API