Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Hatem
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 5, 1972No. [No. 269, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.
This appeal requires us once again to construe the “household exclusion” clause in an automobile liability insurance policy. The policy in question was issued by The National Guild Insurance Company (Company) to Mr. Charles A. Swanson (the insured), and contained the following familiar exceptions to its coverage:
“* * * This policy does not apply: * * * (b) to bodily injury to (1) the spouse or any parent, son, or daughter of the insured or (2) the named insured, or (3) any member of the family of the insured residing in the same household as the insured.” (Emphasis Supplied).
Thomas J. Hatem,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Company v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Shirley C. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Parker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Brokenbaugh v. NJ Manufacturers Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Henderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Prince George's County v. Greenbelt Homes, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.