Legal Opinion
Henderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1973No. 353PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
Plaintiff and Penelope were residents of Illinois. Although they had never been legally married, the plaintiff and Penelope had been living together as man and wife continuously since 1961, during which time three children were born to them. Plaintiff and Penelope, with their children, lived together in the same home. Penelope used the surname of Henderson during this time rather than her own maiden name.
State Farm is a foreign insurance corporation with home offices in Bloomington, Illinois. The policy was negotiated, issued and delivered in Illinois. At the time of the issuance of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- McPhee v. American Motorists InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Hunker v. Royal Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Collins v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
- Neumann v. Wisconsin Natural Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Cohen v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.