Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 7, 1986No. 18, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

In Jennings v. Government Employees Ins., 302 Md. 352, 488 A.2d 166 (1985), we held that the “household exclusion” clause of an automobile liability insurance policy was invalid. We reasoned that the exclusion was contrary to the public policy expressed in Maryland’s compulsory automobile liability insurance law. We are now asked to decide a question that was neither raised nor expressly addressed in Jennings: Whether the “household exclusion” is wholly invalid, or whether its invalidity extends only to the amount of the minimum liability coverage required by the compulsory…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Allstate Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Medex v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API