Legal Opinion
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. Briscoe
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 9, 1967No. [No. 36, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.
The appeal is from a declaration that an automobile liability insurer is required by its policy to defend an additional insured who had been brought in as a third party defendant by the original defendant in a suit by the additional insured’s mother.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Inc. insured one Monday against liability in named amounts for bodily injury (Coverage A) and property damage (Coverage B) caused by accident arising out of the ownership or use of his automobile, and, in addition to the applicable limits of liability, agreed under the provisions as to Coverages A…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Patton v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jennings v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Stearman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Rio Grande Gas Company v. Stahmann Farms, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Stickley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.