Legal Opinion
Bickel v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 11, 1918No. 9414PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS. C.
The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the court below. On October 22. 1909, the owners of certain real estate in the city of Enid filed a petition with the city clerk, reciting that they were the owners of real estate abutting on certain streets in said city, and praying the mayor and council to improve said streets by grading, guttering, paving and curbing the same, describing the character of the improvement requested to be made. On November 19, 1909, the mayor and council of the city of Enid adopted a preliminary resolution of necessity, declaring…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Kerker v. BocherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- City of Muskogee v. RamboSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- City of Coalgate v. GentiliniSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montgomery v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Edmonds v. Town of HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Sanborn v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Hatfield v. MeersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Bocox v. Town of BixbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.