Hatfield v. Meers
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SPERRY, Commissioner.
This action in equity was instituted by plaintiffs, who are taxpayers, registered voters, and property owners of the City of St. Joseph, Missouri. They seek to temporarily and permanently enjoin defendants, the City of St. Joseph, a municipal corporation, its Mayor and its officers, agents and employees, and the chairman and members of the Housing Authority of St. Joseph, from taking any action under the provisions of St. Joseph city ordinance No. 17788 which, they alleged, is void. From a judgment holding the ordinance to be null and void, and permanently enjoining…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. MeadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- State Ex Rel. Westhues v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Randolph County Board of Education v. ScaliaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- District of Columbia v. Washington Home Ownership Council, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Schweig v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Osage Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Tyler v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.