Thompson v. City of Marion
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The ultimate question of law involved in these two cases being the same, it is deemed expedient to discuss only the facts relative to the Thompson case. The paramount question presented in both cases is whether the city of Marion, having acted pursuant to the authority conferred hy the provisions of the statute, and having duly found and declared the necessity for the establishment and maintenance of a police relief fund, thereby making operative in that city all the provisions of the statute effectuating the establishment and maintenance of such police relief fund, may by any subsequent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Brown v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Simpson v. State ex rel. EislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Dieckroegger v. ConnersOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Wheeler v. BentleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Independent School District of Cedar Rapids v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- City of Cincinnati v. GambleOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Strain v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Redman v. Ohio Department of Industrial RelationsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- WRIGHT v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.