Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Arkansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 21, 1932No. 30,882PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to require the city of Arkansas City to provide suitable rooms for holding the city court in that city and to provide suitable furniture, fuel, lights and necessary incidental expenses of such court as required by R. S. 20-1411.

The purpose of the action is to test the validity of city ordinance No. 886, repealing an earlier ordinance, No. 844, which established a city court in the city of Arkansas City under the provisions of R. S. 20-1401 to 20-1423 and 20-1401 as amended. The defendant *454city of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quintin v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Mitchell v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. State ex rel. Wheeler v. BentleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Boynton v. GaitskillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. City of Garden City v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Thompson v. City of MarionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. HanniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Upper Penns Neck Tp. v. Lower Penns Neck Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API