Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Strain v. Houston

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1941No. 28367PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Iíabt, J.

The questions of law presented by this record are: (1) Is it the duty of the relator, as Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, to enforce the provisions of Section 17-la, General Code, and, if so, may he invoke the remedy of mandamus against the respondent for that purpose? (2) May the Legislature enact a general law “fixing and regulating the hours of labor” of firemen employed by cities, and providing “for the comfort, health, safety and general welfare” of such firemen, or are such provisions matters of local self-government, not subject to regulation or control by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Van Gilder v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. The People v. . PinckneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. State Ex Rel. Ramey v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cleveland v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. City of Cleveland ex rel. Neelon v. LocherOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Borough of Jamesburg v. HubbsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Daly v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API