Legal Opinion
Carroll Co. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 26, 2012No. Civil Action No. WMN-11-1700PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant The Sherwin-Williams Company’s Motion to *560Dismiss, ECF No. 10. The motion has been fully briefed. Upon a review of the papers and applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary, Local Rule 105.6, and that the motion to dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This action involves a dispute over the clean-up obligations of the seller of a nine-acre tract of land. On December 23, 2005, Plaintiff Carroll Company (Carroll) and Defendant The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chambers v. King Buick GMC, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- EDI Precast, LLC v. CarnahanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Armellini v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Blumberg v. RoneyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority v. Samaha Associates, PCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.