EDI Precast, LLC v. Carnahan
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion disposes of Plaintiff EDI Precast, LLC’s (“EDI”) Partial Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF *620No. 52, and accompanying Memorandum, ECF No. 52-1; Defendants Raymond K. Carnahan, Jr. and Northern Virginia Erectors, LLC’s (“NVE”)1 Opposition, ECF No. 58; Plaintiffs Supplement (“Pl.’s Supp.”), ECF No. 61; and Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs Supplement (“Defs.’ Supp. Resp.”), ECF No. 63.
I also have received Defendants’ Request for a Hearing, ECF No. 53. Having reviewed the filings, I find that a hearing is unnecessary. See Loe.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brightview Group, LP v. TeetersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Equity Prime Mortgage, LLC v. 1st Financial, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Lifestyle Realty, LLC v. KirnDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- MOSES v. WAYFAIR INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- McKinney v. Towd Point Mortgage Trust Asset-Backed SecuritiesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.