Legal Opinion
Hudie v. Aliquippa & Southern Railroad
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 7, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 65-949PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
In the Substituted Complaint Hudie and other conductor-brakemen of the Ali-quippa & Southern Railroad Company, and Local Lodge 1053 of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, the certified bargaining agent of all train service employees of that Railroad, seek an injunction requiring the defendant carrier to comply in all respects with Article I, Section (c) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (“Contract”) between Local 1053 of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen and the carrier;1 to enjoin the carrier from making any changes in the “rate of bonus in contravention of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Order of Railway Conductors v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'mara v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Switchmen's Union Of North America, Afl-Cio v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Cummings v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- O'Mara v. Erie Lackawanna RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Switchmen's Union of North America v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.