Cummings v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge:
The instant appeal arises from an order by the lower court denying the Plaintiff-Appellants’ petition for reconsid*139eration and affirming a previous order which sustained the Defendant-Appellee’s exceptions and entered a judgment n.o.v. in its favor. The Appellants instituted this action asserting that the Appellee had breached their respective contracts of employment. After a non-jury trial resulted in a verdict for the Appellants, the lower court determined that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, and entered a judgment n.o.v. The Appellants contend that their action was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Harold R. Magnuson v. Burlington Northern, Inc., D. S. Nelson, J. H. Woolford, and G. J. O'COnnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cummings v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987