Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. Vanderpool

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1917No. 1107PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

The appellant bank brought this suit against appellee, Vanderpool, upon the following note and indorsement:

“$768.00. Minneapolis, Minn., June 29, 1914.
“One year after date I promise to pay to the order of the O. W. Kerr Company seven hundred sixty-eight and no/100 dollars at the office of the O. W. Kerr Company, Minneapolis, Minn., with interest after date at the rate of six per cent, per annum until fully paid, value received. Interest payable annually. Deferred payments of interest to draw same rate as principal sum.
“- Payment on Contract No. L-.
“F. W. Vanderpool.
“Plainview, Texas.
“The O.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Herman v. GunterTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Richardson v. FellnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  4. Goldman v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Cabaness v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Robert B. Wallace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Utah Lake Irr. Co. v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Arrington v. Mercantile Protective Bureau, Inc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. StumpelNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Abilene v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API