Legal Opinion

Cabaness v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 1898PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Falls. Tried below before Hon.'Sam. E. Scott.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

The original plaintiff, S.W.Holland,filed this suit in the District Court of Falls County on the 5th day of November, 1890, against the defendant M. W. Cabaness, to rescind a contract of sale. Plaintiff alleges that inDecember, 1889,he owned a tract of 350acres of land in Falls County, Texas, near the town of Eeagan, which he valued at $3000; and the defendant Cabaness owned a stock of cattle running on the range in Mitchell and adjoining counties, which he valued at $2000; and McDowell & Peyton owned a tract of 95 acres of land near Eeagan, which they valued at $2000;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pendarvis v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Seymour v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Perkins v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Continental Ins. Co. of New York v. NaborsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Daniel v. SpaethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry Co. of Texas v. RenoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API