Legal Opinion

Herman v. Gunter

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1892No. 3118PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Burke. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARR, Judge,

Section A.—The counsel for plaintiffs in error makes the following statement of the nature and result of the suit:

“This suit was brought by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against plaintiffs in error, on January 12, 1887, on a promissory note dated July 1, 1885, signed by J. L. Herman, and payable to his order six months after date, and indorsed by said Herman, and also by J. J. Levy and E. M. Tillman. In plaintiffs’ petition, it is alleged that plaintiffs bought said note from Belle C. Pierce, and that the same was transferred to him for a valuable consideration before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Collins v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Alstin v. CundiffTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Scotland County v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Blum v. LogginsTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Greneaux v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1851

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Adams v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Worsham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Kone v. Security Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Daniel v. SpaethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Hamilton-Turner Grocery Co. v. HanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API