Legal Opinion

Landsman v. Maryland Home Improvement Commission

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 22, 2003No. 436, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

We are asked to decide in this case whether the General Assembly’s 2000 amendment to the Home Improvement Guaranty Fund, increasing by a third the maximum amount a homeowner can recover for actual loss due to the unsatisfactory work of a contractor, applies retroactively to contracts entered into before the effective date of that amendment. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it does.

BACKGROUND

The underlying facts are not in dispute. Appellant, Sheldon I. Landsman, entered into a contract for a home improvement project with David Somerville, t/a Somerville Construction, on January…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Marzullo v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. State Commission on Human Relations v. Amecom Division of Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Missouri Real Estate Commission v. RayfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Chavis v. Blibaum Assoc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene v. VNA HospiceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Cutchember v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  5. Kelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API