Legal Opinion
Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 29, 2002No. 71, 121, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
We issued writs of certiorari in these cases to determine the constitutionality of retroactive provisions in two statutes enacted by the General Assembly.
Ch. 59 of the Acts of 2000, effective October 1, 2000, enacted detailed regulations governing provisions for late fees in “consumer contracts,” including regulations concerning the allowable amounts of late fees. Section 5 of Ch. 59 stated that “this Act shall apply to all late fees provided for in contracts entered into, or in effect, on or after November 5, 1995.” In addition, Section 6 stated that the Act shall apply to…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Waybright v. Frederick County, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.