Legal Opinion
Chavis v. Blibaum Assoc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 2, 2020No. 0334/19PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Larry S. Chavis, et al. v. Blibaum Associates, P.A., No. 334, Sept. Term, 2019; Bryione K. Moore v. Peak Management LLC, No. 528, Sept. Term 2019. Opinion filed on July 2, 2020, by Berger, J. DEBT COLLECTION – MCDCA– METHODS– AMOUNT OF DEBT The MCDCA may be used by a debtor to challenge methods of debt collection. A debtor may not use the MCDCA to challenge the amount of a debt, which the creditor had a right to collect. DEBT COLLECTION – MCDCA – WRIT OF GARNISHMENT A creditor does not violate the MCDCA, § 14-202(8) of the Commercial Law Article, by using wage garnishment to collect the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Diane Russell v. Absolute Collection ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Stewart v. BiermanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Chavis v. Blibaum & Assoc. Moore v. Peak Mgmt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Kemp v. Nationstar MortgageCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Newsom v. Brock & Scott, PLLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.