Legal Opinion
United States v. 38.80 Acres of Land
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 1977No. 77-189-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*891ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES ASPHALT CORPORATION EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE AN ANSWER
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
This condemnation action is before the court on defendant United States Asphalt Corporation’s motion for an extension of time within which to file an answer in which it may or may not wish to set up defenses and objections to the taking of its property. Plaintiff has filed a response opposing the motion on the grounds that the court lacks authority to grant a motion for extension of time, since Rule 71A(e) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure makes it mandatory for a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Edward T. Hulson and Walter A. Christensen v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Atlantic Seaboard Corporation, a Corporation v. Madeleine Kneppelhout Van Sterkenburg and Cornelis Kneppelhout Van Sterkenburg, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- R. B. Rands Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. 140.80 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Georgopolous v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Trerotola v. Local 72 of the International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996