Legal Opinion

Atlantic Seaboard Corporation, a Corporation v. Madeleine Kneppelhout Van Sterkenburg and Cornelis Kneppelhout Van Sterkenburg, Her Husband

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1963No. 8811PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

Without questioning the condemnor’s right to condemn or the amount of the award as determined by the District Court, the condemnees have appealed, raising a number of procedural points in the apparent hope of obtaining a new trial before a jury and, possibly, damages for trespass on account of the condemnor’s acts upon the land during the pendency of this appeal. We find no merit in any of the several points raised.

Atlantic Seaboard Corporation is a Delaware Corporation and, within the meaning of the Natural Gas Act, 1 is a “natural-gas company” engaged in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HirschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. City of Davenport v. Three-Fifths of an Acre of LandDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1957
  3. United States v. 211.59 Acres of Land, More or LessDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Western Pocahontas Props. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Transcon. Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Permanent Easements for 2.14 Acres & Temp. Easements for 3.59 Acres in Conestoga Twp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API