Trerotola v. Local 72 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
WHEREAS defendants Local 72 and Local 858 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“defendants”) move this Court to extend defendants’ time to respond to plaintiff Vincent Trerotola’s (“plaintiff’) motion for summary judgement, pursuant to this Court’s Individual Rule 2(b) (“Rule 2(b)”), or in the alternative, to accept a late response to plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 6(b)(2); and
WHEREAS plaintiff filed the underlying motion for summary judgment on March 4, 1996; and
*655WHEREAS this motion for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Frank J. Ruiz v. Elmer O. CadyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Kleckner v. Glover Trucking Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LaMorteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. HuppeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999