Legal Opinion

United States v. Rands

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 13, 1967No. 54PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

In this case the Court is asked to decide whether the compensation which the United States is constitutionally required to pay when it condemns riparian land includes the land’s value as a port site. Respondents owned land along the Columbia River in the State of Oregon. They leased the land to the State with an option to purchase, it apparently being contemplated that the State would use the land as an industrial park, part of which would function as a port. The option was never exercised, for the land was taken by the United States in connection with the John Day Lock and Dam Project,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API