Legal Opinion
R. B. Rands Et Ux. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1966No. 20280_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants owned two tracts of land along the Columbia River, about six miles upstream from the present John Day Dam. On November 1, 1962, they leased this and other property to the state of Oregon, which wanted it for an industrial park. That industrial development, for maximum utility, required access to the Columbia River; because two railroads and the United States owned most of the land along the river, appellants’ property was especially valuable as a port site. The lease agreement gave Oregon an option to purchase the land. Most of the land was priced, under the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Ralph M. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Otis PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. 18.2 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of ButteDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1977
- Sherrill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.