Eichhoff v. Eichhoff
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This action was brought to set aside a judgment and decree rendered by the superior court of Marin county in 1882, annulling the marriage between Gustave Eichhoff and Melocene Eichhoff.
The complaint shows as a cause of action that in the suit for the annulment of the marriage this plaintiff, defendant in that action, was not served with summons. *46had no notice of the suit, and never appeared therein, and that said judgment was procured by the fraudulent practices of said Gustave Eichhoff.
At the trial the plaintiff to sustain her allegations put in evidence the judgment-roll in the action for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re Estate of EichhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- de McKinlay v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Gale v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.