Legal Opinion
Scott v. Warden
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1931No. Docket No. 4238PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR, JUSTICE THOMPSON (R. L.) Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This is an appeal from a decree quieting title to an unimproved lot at Hermosa Beach, valued at $600.
In February, 1922, Sarah W. Hughes and A. S. Hughes, husband and wife, owned lot 89, Walter Ransome Company’s Venable Place of Los Angeles County according to the map of that tract recorded in book 9 of maps, page 150, Los Angeles records. February 6, 1922, the plaintiff purchased that lot from these owners, on contract, for $600. The deed of conveyance was not executed. Upon refusal to convey the property pursuant to contract, a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Chapman v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Drew v. Superior Court of Mendocino CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Numitor Gold Mining Co. v. KatzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Clayton v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Wood v. DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Goldsworthy v. DobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Elliott v. BertschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.