Legal Opinion

Wood v. Davidson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1944No. Civ. 12541PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet their title to all of the waters of Bobinson Spring, which is located upon the adjoining lands of defendants. Defendants denied the existence of title in plaintiffs, and, by cross-complaint, claimed title to the waters by adverse possession. By its judgment the trial court provided that defendants have gained a limited title to the waters by adverse possession, that is, that defendants own and have the first right to use all of the waters of the spring for irrigation, stock and domestic purposes from April 1st to September 10th of each year, and that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Curtis v. La Grande Hydraulic Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Park v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Nielsen v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Noble v. Kertz & Sons Feed & Fuel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Chapman v. Sky L'Onda Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Gularte v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API