Chapman v. Moore
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was originally commenced by M. M. Davis, as plaintiff, and subsequent to its commencement the present plaintiff, William Chapman, was substituted in the superior court for said Davis as plaintiff.
The action was brought to quiet title to lot 4 in block “C” of the Sunset Tract in the city of Los Angeles, the plaintiff making the usual allegations of ownership of the property, and the defendants asserting claims thereto adverse to him.
The defendant 0. A. Moore in her answer denied the alleged ownership of plaintiff, and asserted ownership of the lot to be in herself; the defendants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barr v. Gratz's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Ligare v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Gage v. GoudyIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Plott v. KittelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Elliott v. BertschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Scott v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cradduck v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.