Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Schultz

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1935No. S. F. 15304PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Action to quiet title to certain real property located on Sacramento Street, San Francisco. The issues as finally joined resolved the case into a contest between the plaintiff in intervention, claiming title to the property by virtue of a delinquent tax sale and tax deed, and defendants Schultz and the Fischers and their successor, Alma Investment Company, claiming continued ownership of the property and invalidity of the tax sale proceedings. Plaintiff in intervention, Pirineas D. Clayton, produced a certified copy of judgment rendered in an action between the purchaser at the tax…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Teralta Land & Water Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gottstein v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Sawyer v. Berkeley Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Scott v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Risso v. CrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. Board of Supervisors of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Hammond v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Jones v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Clayton v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Clayton v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API