Legal Opinion
Garris v. Carpenter
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1939No. Civ. 6061PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONCUR, J., pro tem.
This action has heretofore been before this court on appeal by plaintiffs, appellants herein, from a ruling by the trial court sustaining demurrers to their complaint without leave to amend. (Garris v. Mitchell, 7 Cal. App. (2d) 430 [46 Pac. (2d) 225].) A statement of the contentions of appellants constituting their cause of action as set forth in said decision is referred to for the purpose of this opinion.
E. Forrest Mitchell was Insurance Commissioner of the State of .California at the time of the commencement of this action and was succeeded in that office by respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kendall v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- H. D. Roosen Co. v. Pacific Radio Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Mitchell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Ballerino v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Garris v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by13 opinions
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Quackenbush v. Aurora National Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Texas Commerce Bank v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- San José Realty S.E. v. Fénix de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.