Legal Opinion

DOE BY DOE v. Greenville Hosp. System

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 25, 1994No. 2178PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

The plaintiff, Mary Doe, a minor under the age of sixteen, was a candy striper at a hospital operated by the defendant, Greenville Hospital System. She alleges a 31-year-old male employee sexually assaulted her while she was working at the hospital.

The trial involved claims by Mary Doe against the hospital for negligent hiring and negligent supervision of the male employee. There was also a derivative claim by Mary Doe’s father for loss of custody, companionship, and service of his daughter. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Mary Doe for $545,000. The trial judge reduced the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Degenhart v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Windham v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Spaugh v. A.C.L. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Camper v. MinorTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Doe v. ATC, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Kristin Beul v. Asse International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Doe v. Bishop of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API