Legal Opinion
Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis Dairy
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 31, 2006No. 04-3680, 05-1998, 05-3770PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, who is being permitted to litigate her case under a pseudonym, was a high-school student hired as a part-time ice cream “scooper” at the defendant’s store in Bartlett, Illinois. She sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, with supplemental claims for battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and related common law wrongs, claiming that a shift supervisor at the store, Matt Nayman, had harassed her sexually, culminating in sexual intercourse, for which he was prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned. For Doe was only 16 years old…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Montgomery v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- MacH Mining, LLC v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Lapka v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Bahri Begolli v. Home Depot, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Koch, Randolph v. Cox, ChristopherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.