Doe v. ATC, INC.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
KITTREDGE, J.:
This is an appeal from the granting of a directed verdict in a negligent retention action. The dispositive issue, as narrowly framed in the trial court, is whether a jury question existed as a result of the employer’s decision not to fire an employee based on the report of a single incident of an inappropriate sexual advance toward a fellow employee. We agree with the trial court that a jury question was not created by the employer’s decision to retain the employee. We affirm.
FACTS 1 '
Appellant Sharon Doe 2 is the mother of Audra Doe, a disabled adult female. Audra rode a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Degenhart v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Gaines v. Monsanto Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Kase v. EbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Holcombe v. Helena Chemical Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Howard v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Avery v. MG Logistics IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.