Legal Opinion

Doe v. ATC, INC.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 19, 2005No. 4063PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITTREDGE, J.:

This is an appeal from the granting of a directed verdict in a negligent retention action. The dispositive issue, as narrowly framed in the trial court, is whether a jury question existed as a result of the employer’s decision not to fire an employee based on the report of a single incident of an inappropriate sexual advance toward a fellow employee. We agree with the trial court that a jury question was not created by the employer’s decision to retain the employee. We affirm.

FACTS 1 '

Appellant Sharon Doe 2 is the mother of Audra Doe, a disabled adult female. Audra rode a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Degenhart v. Knights of ColumbusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Gaines v. Monsanto Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  2. Kase v. EbertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Holcombe v. Helena Chemical Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  4. Howard v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Avery v. MG Logistics IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API