Legal Opinion

Spaugh v. A.C.L. Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 1, 1930No. 12986PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

This action by Mrs. Olive Spaug'h, as plaintiff, against the defendant, Atlantic Coast Tine Railroad Company, was commenced in the Court of Common Pleas for Florence County, May 18, 1929, for the purpose of recovering damages against the defendant in the sum of $2,900.00, for injury to the plaintiff, alleged to have been sustained as a result of misinformation given her by defendant’s ticket agent at Florence, S. C.,‘ in regard to the train connections 'between, the said City of Florence and the Town of Holly Hill, S. C. Issues being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Entzminger v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  2. Taber v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. Campbell v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Milhous v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Murrell v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Padgett v. Colonial Wholesale Distributing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. DOE BY DOE v. Greenville Hosp. SystemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Bray v. Marathon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Robertsen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API