Legal Opinion

Degenhart v. Knights of Columbus

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 13, 1992No. 23684PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

Appellants William J. Degenhart, Vincent J. Degenhart, and Robert W. Degenhart (the Degenharts) assert that the master-in-equity erred in holding that respondent Knights of Columbus was not liable for the acts of its agent, Michael A. Aun, II. We affirm.

I. FACTS

Knights of Columbus is a fraternal, nonprofit organization that offers life insurance, health insurance, and annuities to its members. Aun and Knights of Columbus entered into a Field Agent Contract wherein Aun was authorized to solicit and procure applications for life and health insurance on the lives of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Rayfield Ex Rel. Estate of Rayfield v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. James v. Kelly Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Bayle v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Rickborn v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. McCourt by and Through McCourt v. AbernathySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API