Degenhart v. Knights of Columbus
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Justice:
Appellants William J. Degenhart, Vincent J. Degenhart, and Robert W. Degenhart (the Degenharts) assert that the master-in-equity erred in holding that respondent Knights of Columbus was not liable for the acts of its agent, Michael A. Aun, II. We affirm.
I. FACTS
Knights of Columbus is a fraternal, nonprofit organization that offers life insurance, health insurance, and annuities to its members. Aun and Knights of Columbus entered into a Field Agent Contract wherein Aun was authorized to solicit and procure applications for life and health insurance on the lives of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Rayfield Ex Rel. Estate of Rayfield v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
3Cited by63 opinions
- James v. Kelly Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Bayle v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Rickborn v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- McCourt by and Through McCourt v. AbernathySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.