Legal Opinion
Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 16, 1951PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNevin, District Judge
(sitting by designation) .
On August 18, 1948, with the consent and upon the agreement of all the parties to this action, an order (later to be referred to) was approved by Chief Judge Knox, wherein it was provided inter alien that “the issues presented by the affirmative defenses of the statutes of limitations to the claim asserted in the particularized complaint be tried as separate issues in advance of the trial of the other issues of this action”. Subsequently the “separate issues” thus tO' be tried were referred by Judge Knox to the present judge (of Dayton, Southern District of Ohio) who…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1934
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co. (Delaware)District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Kansas City, Missouri v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
- Delta Theaters, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1958
- Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.