Legal Opinion

William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 16, 1954No. Civ. A. 987PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

This action, based on fraud, traces its devious course back to 1929 and 1931. This preliminary and abbreviated statement of facts is largely taken from a former opinion of this Court of July 12, 1950, 92 F.Supp. 885.

In 1929 and 1931 defendant’s predecessor, a South Dakota corporation of the same name as defendant, commenced two suits in this court against the Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. and the Root Refining Company, respectively, charging them with the infringement of two of its patents, the Egloff and Dubbs patents. These suits were consolidated for trial, and an…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  2. Beals v. Washington International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  3. Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  4. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Jardel Co., Inc. v. Hirsch, Arkin, Pinehurst, Inc., a Penna. Corp., and Rudolph GuistiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API