Legal Opinion

Haney v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 2004No. F042980PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAWSON, J.

In this appeal, a former employee alleges he was discharged because he complained about fraudulent billing practices and refused to implement those practices and, thus, his discharge violated public policy. The employer obtained summary adjudication of the wrongful discharge claim on the ground that it was preempted by federal labor statutes because (1) the employee engaged in arguably protected concerted activity and (2) the claim could not be decided independent of the just cause termination provisions contained in the applicable collective bargaining agreement.

We hold that…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Yau v. Santa Margarita FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Merced Irrigation District v. Superior Court of Merced CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Hypertouch, Inc. v. Valueclick, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Bowen v. M. Caratan, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API