Legal Opinion
Bowen v. M. Caratan, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 2, 2015No. Case No. 1:14-CV-00397-LJO-JLTPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court in the above-styled and numbered cause of action is Defendants M. Caratan, Inc.’s, doing business as Columbine Vineyards (“Columbine,” or “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment, filed July 22, 2015. (Doc. 15). Plaintiff Janet Bowen (“Plaintiff,” or “Bowen”) filed her Opposition on August 17, 2015' (Doc. 17), and Defendants filed a' Reply oh August 25, 2015 (Doc. 19). The motion is appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See Local Rule…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matthew Uronis v. Cabot Oil & Gas CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Canupp v. Children's Receiving Home of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Slaieh v. SimonsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- (PS) Mackintosh v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Bales v. County of El DoradoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.