Legal Opinion
Hypertouch, Inc. v. Valueclick, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 2011No. B218603PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*813Opinion
ZELON, J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant Hypertouch, Inc. (Appellant), filed an action alleging that ValueClick, Inc., various ValueClick subsidiaries and PrimaryAds, Inc. (Respondents), violated Business and Professions Code section 17529.5, subdivision (a),1 which prohibits entities from advertising in a commercial electronic message (e-mail) that contains various types of deceptive content. Respondents moved for summary judgment, arguing that Appellant’s claims were preempted by the “Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003” (CAN-SPAM Act or Act; 15…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Altria Group, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Kraft Foods, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Multani v. Witkin & NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- American Way Cellular, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Balsam v. Trancos, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Rosolowski v. Guthy-Renker LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.