Legal Opinion
Greve v. Taft Realty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1929No. Docket No. 3902PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff began this action to recover of and from the defendants, and especially from the Taft Realty Company, the sum of $6,266.50, based upon an instrument in writing which is in the words and figures following, to wit:
“Hollywood, Calif. 6/6/23, '
“It is understood and agreed that Frank II. Greve is to receive 2% of the gross sales made by us in the Greve Tract at the S. W. intersection of Pico Blvd. and Preuss Road, known as Tract No. 6800, in consideration of his getting this tract for us to handle.
“We also agree that he shall be paid 2% gross on sales from any other acceptable tract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Howard v. the Winton Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Hoffman v. Guy M. Rush Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Cal-State Business Products & Services, Inc. v. RicohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Carlesimo v. SchwebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.