Prescott v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William E. Bell, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fullerton, C. J.
— The appellant instituted this action to recover for an alleged breach of a contract of employment entered into between the appellant and respondent. To his original complaint a demurrer was interposed, which the trial court sustained. Thereupon he took leave *178to amend, and thereafter filed an amended complaint. Issue of fact was joined on the amended complaint, and the cause set down for trial. At the trial the respondent objected to the introduction of any evidence on the part of the plaintiff on the ground that the amended complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Clearwater v. MeredithSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Carter White Lead Co. v. KinlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Ganceart v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phelps v. Shawprint, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Reed v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Goshert v. WirthWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Curtis v. QuarriesWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Black v. MillikenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.