Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Co. v. Dolan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1892No. 610PublishedCited by 97 opinions

From tlie Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

Tlie first error of which the appellant complains is the overruling of its demurrer to the appellee’s complaint, which, with the caption and formal parts omitted, is as follows: “ The plaintiff James Dolan complains of the defendant, the Pennsylvania Company, and for cause of action says that the defendant company was, on the days and times of the grievances hereinafter mentioned, a railroad corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana, owning, using and operating a line of railroad known as the Jeffersonville, Madison and Indianapolis Railroad, together with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Hinchcliffe v. KoontzIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Pickett v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Littell v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Arentz v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. HoulihanIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kiyose v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API