Legal Opinion

LaPerriere v. Shrum

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. S-993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case raises the issue whether an offer of judgment made under AS 09.30.-065 included costs and attorney’s fees not expressly mentioned in the offer. The of-ferees filed a written notice of acceptance and moved to enforce the judgment requesting that costs and attorney’s fees be awarded in addition to the $10,000 offered. The trial court denied the motion and held that the $10,000 offer of judgment included costs and attorney’s fees. We conclude the trial court erred and reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Steven and Judith Shrum (the Shrams), through their attorney…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tsakres v. OwensAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Rules v. SturnAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. River Road Constr. Co. v. Ring Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mapco Express, Inc. v. FaulkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. MacKie v. ChizmarAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rule v. TobinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. Bobich v. HughesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Van Dort v. CullitonAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API