Rules v. Sturn
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
This is an appeal from the superior court decision denying the appellants’ motion to enter satisfaction of judgment.
James Rules was the operator of a truck' which collided with an automobile driven by Linda Sturn. Linda and Lawrence Sturn subsequently filed a claim for personal injuries against Rules and his employer, William Rutherford, the appellants. During the course of the litigation, the parties entered into settlement negotiations. On August 24, 1981, counsel for the Sturns received a written offer of judgment made pursuant to the provisions of Alaska Rule of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Tsakres v. OwensAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Centric-Jones Co. v. HufnagelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Day v. MooreAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.